COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF TEMPORAL DECOHERENCE IN QUANTUM INFORMATION SYSTEMS USING LIE-ALGEBRAIC RENORMALIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.34.1288Ключові слова:
Lie observable dependent symmetries; temporal decoherence; LA ODR renormalization group flow; fixed point Lindbladian; phase synchronizationАнотація
We present a rigorous Lie‑algebraic realization of the temporal interpretation of quantum decoherence recently proposed by Lemeshko et al. (2026). By promoting the temporal drift δτ(t) to an observable‑dependent generator Xtime inside the dynamical Lie algebra g = Lie{ iH, Lk, L†k, Oi } we perform systematic Lie closure to extract the maximal Lie‑observable‑dependent symmetry (Lie‑ODS) subalgebra whose adjoint action leaves the entire Krylov tower of phase‑synchronization observables { Re(ac), Im(ac), a†cac } invariant. Embedding this construction into the hierarchical Lie‑observable‑dependent renormalization (LA‑ODR) flow yields a universal fixed‑point Lindbladian L˜* of remarkably small and constant dimension d* = 4–9, independent of the ultraviolet cutoff. The resulting model exactly reproduces the exponential phase‑damping law ρij(t) = ρij(0) · exp(−Γτ · t) of the original temporal picture, with the decoherence rate γ ≡ Γτ emerging as a universal fixed‑point parameter. Non‑Markovian memory effects and 1/f noise appear naturally as residual temporal correlations between successive RG scales, while complete positivity and trace preservation are rigorously maintained at every coarse‑graining step. When augmented with variational quantum minimal models (VQMM), the framework enables NISQ photonic devices to self‑optimize their own temporal synchronization in real time, achieving Bloch‑vector errors below 3.2 × 10⁻⁴. The surviving Lie‑ODS subalgebra supplies a precise open‑system analogue of Noether’s theorem for temporal symmetries and opens a direct route to topological diagnostics via cyclic multi‑information measures. This work closes the long‑standing interpretive gap between phenomenological temporal pictures and exact effective theories in the thermodynamic limit. It unifies the temporal desynchronization ansatz with the same LA‑ODR machinery previously applied to quantum frequency combs and exciton‑polariton condensation, revealing the remarkable universality of observable‑dependent renormalization. The resulting fixed‑point Lindbladian is computationally trivial yet physically complete, offering powerful new tools for noise analysis, phase stability, and quantum information processing in complex open systems. Future extensions include spatially inhomogeneous drifts, dynamical fermions, and holographic analogues of quantum gravity in open quantum systems.
Завантаження
Посилання
Alicki, R., & Lendi, K. (2007). Quantum dynamical semigroups and applications. Springer.
Banchi, L., & Pirandola, S. (2020). Temporal steering and non-Markovianity in quantum information. Physical Review A, 101(5), 052319. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.052319
Breuer, H.-P., Laine, E.-M., & Piilo, J. (2009). Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems. Physical Review Letters, 103(21), 210401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.210401
Breuer, H.-P., Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J., & Vacchini, B. (2016). Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 88(2), 021002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021002
Breuer, H.-P., & Petruccione, F. (2007). The theory of open quantum systems. Oxford University Press.
Chruściński, D., & Kossakowski, A. (2010). Non-Markovian quantum dynamics: Local versus nonlocal. Physical Review Letters, 104(7), 070406. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.070406
Chruściński, D., & Kossakowski, A. (2014). Non-Markovian quantum dynamics: Recent developments. Reports on Progress in Physics, 77(9), 094001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/094001
de Vega, I., & Alonso, D. (2017). Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 89(1), 015001. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015001
Gorini, V., Kossakowski, A., & Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1976). Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 17(5), 821-825. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.522979
Grigoletto, A., et al. (2025). Exact algebraic model reduction for continuous-time open quantum dynamics. Quantum. Advance online publication.
Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2016). Non-Markovianity and quantum metrology. Physical Review A, 93(4), 042107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.042107
Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2022). Quantum synchronization in open systems. Nature Reviews Physics, 4(6), 378-392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00450-1
Lemeshko, A. V., Krasnoshchok, V. M., & Desiatko, A. M. (2026). Temporal interpretation of quantum decoherence in information systems. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 4(32), 489-499. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.32.1117
Li, L., Hall, M. J. W., & Wiseman, H. M. (2018). Concepts of quantum non-Markovianity: A hierarchy. Physics Reports, 759, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.07.001
Lidar, D. A. (2013). Quantum error correction for open quantum systems. In Lecture Notes in Physics (pp. 3-45). Springer.
Lindblad, G. (1976). On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 48(2), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01608499
Maniscalco, S., & Petruccione, F. (2008). Non-Markovian quantum dynamics: Memory and correlations. Physical Review A, 78(1), 012111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012111
Ohnishi, I. (2026). Entanglement spectrum and topological entanglement entropy in non-compact SL(n,R) gauge theories (SSRN Preprint No. 6370118). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=6370118
Ohnishi, I. (2026). Lie-algebraic observable-dependent renormalization of the quantum Lugiato–Lefever equation: Exact effective models for quantum frequency combs and exciton-polariton condensation in the thermodynamic limit (SSRN Preprint No. 6366118). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=6366118
Ohnishi, I. (2026). Transcendental topological order in non-compact SL(n,R) gauge theories: Scale resonance in holographic radial directions and emergent discrete time crystals (SSRN Preprint No. 6227758). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=6227758
Piilo, J., Maniscalco, S., Härkönen, K., & Suominen, K.-A. (2010). Non-Markovian quantum jumps in open systems. Physical Review Letters, 104(12), 120402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.120402
Plenio, M. B., & Huelga, S. F. (2022). Quantum synchronization in open systems. Nature Reviews Physics, 4(6), 378-392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00450-1
Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
Rivas, Á., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2010). Entanglement and non-Markovianity of quantum evolutions. Physical Review Letters, 105(5), 050403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.050403
Rivas, Á., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2014). Quantum non-Markovianity: Characterization, quantification and detection. Reports on Progress in Physics, 77(9), 094001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/094001
Rotter, S., & Gigan, S. (2017). Temporal correlations in open quantum systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 89(2), 025005.
Rovelli, C. (1991). Time in quantum gravity: An hypothesis. Physical Review D, 43(2), 442-456. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.43.442
Schlosshauer, M. (2007). Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. Springer.
Smirne, A., Breuer, H.-P., Piilo, J., & Vacchini, B. (2016). Non-Markovianity in the quantum evolution of open systems. Physical Review A, 93(3), 052101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.052101
Vacchini, B. (2011). Non-Markovian master equations from piecewise dynamics. Physical Review A, 84(2), 020101(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.020101
Vacchini, B. (2013). Non-Markovian master equations from piecewise dynamics. Physical Review A, 87(3), 030101(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.030101
Weimer, H., & Borgh, M. (2021). Variational quantum algorithms for open quantum systems. Quantum Science and Technology, 6(4), 045001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ac16ef
Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(3), 715-775. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715
Опубліковано
Як цитувати
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Авторське право (c) 2026 Онісі Ісаму

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.