METHODS OF IMPLEMENTING DISINFORMATION DETECTION IN SOCIAL NETWORKS BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.30.965Keywords:
disinformation source detection; fake news; machine learning; social network; Leiden method; Louvain method.Abstract
The article considers modern approaches to automated detection of disinformation in social networks using artificial intelligence technologies. The evolution of methods is analyzed - from linguistic analysis of texts and classical machine learning algorithms to deep neural networks and transformative models. It is shown that traditional statistical methods do not provide the necessary accuracy when processing large amounts of data, while models based on CNN, RNN and BERT demonstrate high efficiency due to the ability to take into account context and semantic connections. Special attention is paid to multimodal analysis, which combines text, image and video processing to detect complex types of fakes, in particular deepfake. The use of the Leiden method is proposed as an innovative approach to clustering social graphs, which allows detecting coordinated communities of users spreading disinformation. An experimental study was conducted on data from the Twitter social network, which confirmed the high performance of the Leiden algorithm compared to the Louvain method. The obtained modularity (0.82) and cluster density (0.74) indicators demonstrated a clear structuring of disinformation communities and the ability to detect up to 78% of bot accounts. The developed model combines social graph analysis with natural language processing (NLP) methods to simultaneously identify sources of disinformation and the content of distributed messages. It is concluded that the integration of graph clustering methods and machine learning is a promising direction in creating automatic monitoring systems for social networks. Further research should focus on the development of explainable models (Explainable AI), multilingual adaptation, and the implementation of anti-fake technologies directly into the infrastructure of social platforms.
Downloads
References
Roumeliotis, K. I., Tselikas, N. D., & Nasiopoulos, D. K. (2025). Fake news detection and classification: A comparative study of convolutional neural networks, large language models, and natural language processing models. Future Internet, 17(1).
Ji, L., & Xie, H. (2025). A modified method on improving power grid resilience based on the Louvain algorithm. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 101883.
Anuar, S. H. H., Abas, Z. A., Yunos, N. M., Zaki, N. H. M., Hashim, N. A., Mokhtar, M. F., ... & Nizam, A. F. (2021, December). Comparison between Louvain and Leiden algorithm for network structure: A review. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2129, No. 1, p. 012028). IOP Publishing.
Traag, V. A., Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2019). From Louvain to Leiden: Guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–12.
Singlan, N., Abou Choucha, F., & Pasquier, C. (2025). A new similarity-based adapted Louvain algorithm (SIMBA) for active module identification in p-value attributed biological networks. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 11360.
Ghosh, S., Halappanavar, M., Tumeo, A., Kalyanaraman, A., Lu, H., Chavarria-Miranda, D., ... & Gebremedhin, A. (2018, May). Distributed louvain algorithm for graph community detection. In 2018 IEEE international parallel and distributed processing symposium (IPDPS) (pp. 885-895). IEEE.
Sharma, B., Kathirvel, P., & Hegde, S. R. (2025). Identifying communities in the virus–host protein–protein interaction networks. In Computational Virology (pp. 307–319). New York, NY: Springer US.
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008.
Doropoulos, S., Karapalidou, E., Charitidis, P., Karakeva, S., & Vologiannidis, S. (2025). Beyond manual media coding: Evaluating large language models and agents for news content analysis. Applied Sciences, 15(14), 8059.
Li, X. (2025). Translator’s centrality and ideology in Chinese-English bilingual news: A case study of texts from the China Daily website. Arts, Culture and Language, 1(3).
Hernández, R., Gutiérrez, I., & Castro, J. (2025). Social network analysis: A novel paradigm for improving community detection. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 18(1), 87.
StopFake. (n.d.). Про нас. https://www.stopfake.org/uk/pro-nas/
VoxUkraine. (n.d.). VoxCheck. https://voxukraine.org/voxcheck
Vysotska, V., & Nazarkevych, M. (2025). Development of an information technology for detecting the sources and networks of disinformation dissemination in cyberspace based on machine learning methods. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4.
Danylyk, V., Vysotska, V., & Nazarkevych, M. (2024). Disinformation, fakes and propaganda identification methods in mass media based on machine learning. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 1(25), 449–467.
Vysotska, V., Nazarkevych, M., Vladov, S., Lozynska, O., Markiv, O., Romanchuk, R., & Danylyk, V. (2024). Devising a method for detecting information threats in the Ukrainian cyberspace based on machine learning. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 132(2).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Марія Назаркевич, Вікторія Висоцька, Ростислав Юринець, Назар Наконечний

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.