METHOD OF SEISMOACOUSTIC MONITORING OF SEPARATE SIGNALS OF EXPLOSIVE FIELDS FOR REMOTE RECONNAISSANCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.30.981

Keywords:

seismoacoustic monitoring, remote reconnaissance, explosive fields, signal classification, mathematical modeling, parametric model, superposition of oscillators, seismic signals, acoustic signals.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the development and justification of an effective method of remote reconnaissance and monitoring that uses the unique physical characteristics of explosive fields. The need for such a method is driven by the requirement for reliable, all-weather, and covert identification and localization of explosion sources, which is critical for security, military, and engineering reconnaissance. The method considers an explosion as a complex source that simultaneously generates seismic (elastic) and acoustic (infrasonic) signals. The main objective of the work is to present a method of seismoacoustic monitoring of explosive fields, which allows not only to register but also to classify individual signals, generating highly informative data for remote reconnaissance. The methodology is based on the stages of mathematical modeling of seismoacoustic processes. These stages include: determining the physical conditions for signal generation: a detailed analysis of the conversion of explosion energy into seismic waves propagating in the ground and acoustic (shock/infrasonic) waves propagating in the atmosphere; mathematical principles of modeling physical processes: development of a formalized approach to describe the propagation and registration of these waves, taking into account the characteristics of the environment. The main scientific result is the creation and justification of a parametric mathematical model of seismoacoustic monitoring. This model is presented as a superposition of oscillators, where each oscillator is responsible for modeling a specific informative component of the explosion signal. The proposed model allows the informative parameters that directly characterize the explosion field signal (e.g., energy, frequency composition, arrival time, amplitude) to be isolated and quantitatively evaluated. The use of oscillator superposition ensures high model flexibility and its ability to adapt to different types of explosive signals and environmental conditions. The proposed method provides a solid theoretical basis for the construction of automated remote reconnaissance systems. The use of a parametric model in the form of a superposition of oscillators allows for the effective classification and localization of explosive events, distinguishing them from natural and man-made noise. This significantly increases the reliability and informativeness of seismoacoustic complexes, making the method a valuable tool for operational control and strategic monitoring.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allaby, A., & Allaby, M. (2003). Oxford dictionary of earth sciences (2nd ed., reissued with corrections and new covers). Oxford University Press.

Dunnicliff, J. (1993). Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance. Wiley.

Lay, T. (Ed.). (2009). Seismological grand challenges in understanding Earth’s dynamic systems: Long-range science plan for seismology workshop. Report to the National Science Foundation, IRIS Consortium.

Marquardt, D. (1963). An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 11(2), 431–441.

Mostovoy, S. V., Mostovoy, V. S., & Osadchuk, A. E. (1998). Non-identified detection of signals against a microseismic background. Geophysical Journal, 18, 265–271.

Mostovoy, V. S. (2011). Optimal estimates of nonlinear parameters in seismic acoustic monitoring models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, (8), 103–106.

Mostovoy, V. S., & Mostovoy, S. V. (2012). On the correctness of nonlinear regression tasks in monitoring natural and man-made objects. Geophysical Journal, 34(2), 140–143.

Mostovoy, V., & Mostovyy, S. (2014). Estimation of parameters of seismic waves. Transactions of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2, 118–123.

Mostovoy, V., & Mostovyi, S. (2016). Mathematical model of seismic signal as a flow of physically non-realizable single seismic waves. Geophysical Journal, 38(5), 166–169.

Mostovoy, V. S., Toliupa, S. V., & Shevchenko, A. M. (2023). Optimization of the dynamic parameters of an object in a mathematical model of seismo-acoustic monitoring of natural and engineering objects. Science-Intensive Technologies, 2(58), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.18372/2310-5461.58.17647

Plessix, R.-E. (2006). A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International, 167(2), 495–509.

Robinson, M., & Houghtalen, R. (2011). Dangerous dams. Rhode Island Canoe/Kayak Association (Rhode Island). Retrieved from https://www.ricka.org/

Shevchenko, A. (2024). Methodology for seismoacoustic monitoring of the impact of shock waves on critical infrastructure facilities. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technology, 4(24), 351–362.

Shevchenko, A. M., & Yarmolai, I. O. (2024). Parametric mathematical model of seismoacoustic monitoring of a single mortar explosion. Telecommunications and Information Technologies, 1(82), 122–129.

Shevchenko, A. M., & Yarmolai, I. O. (2024). Optimization of informative parameters of a mathematical model for seismoacoustic monitoring of natural and engineering objects. Zv’iazok, 5, 83–89.

Shevchenko, A. M. (2024). A mathematical representation of an automated system designed to monitor critical infrastructure objects using seismic and acoustic signals. Scientific Notes of the State University of Telecommunications, 1(5), 85–93.

Downloads


Abstract views: 20

Published

2025-10-26

How to Cite

Yarmolai, I. (2025). METHOD OF SEISMOACOUSTIC MONITORING OF SEPARATE SIGNALS OF EXPLOSIVE FIELDS FOR REMOTE RECONNAISSANCE. Electronic Professional Scientific Journal «Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique», 2(30), 348–359. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.30.981