RICE AND ICE MODELS AS TOOLS FOR FORMALIZING PRIORITIZATION OF IT PRODUCT FUNCTIONALITY IN TRAINING FUTURE IT SPECIALISTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.32.1119

Keywords:

feature prioritization, RICE, ICE, Product Management, Agile, IT product development, startups, feature evaluation methods

Abstract

The relevance of the study is determined by the growing role of product solutions in the development of IT products and the need to develop skills in future IT-specialists for the rational prioritization of functionality in conditions of limited resources and high uncertainty. Insufficient formalization of this process in educational training leads to the dominance of intuitive decisions that do not meet the modern requirements of Agile and data-driven approaches. The article aims to investigate the effectiveness of ICE and RICE models in formalizing the process of prioritizing IT product functionality in the early stages of the life cycle through comparative analysis and empirical testing, and to determine the pedagogical feasibility of their application in training future IT-specialists. The research methodology is based on an empirical analysis of the results of laboratory work performed by third-year students majoring in 122 “Computer Science” within the discipline “Entrepreneurship and Startups.” The study uses methods of comparative analysis, formalisation, and generalisation of the results of functional prioritisation using ICE and RICE models in the Hygger environment. The results showed that the ICE model is an effective tool for the initial selection of ideas at the product conceptualization stage, while the RICE model provides a more objective and analytically sound assessment of priorities when quantitative data is available. It was concluded that the combined use of both models contributes to the formation of systematic product thinking and skills in students. The results showed that the ICE model is an effective tool for the initial selection of ideas at the product conceptualization stage, while the RICE model provides a more objective and analytically sound assessment of priorities when quantitative data is available. This approach reflects a shift in IT education from traditional subject-based learning to project-oriented education, in which students learn planning, teamwork, and assessment of development effectiveness. Thus, the study's results demonstrate that integrating ICE and RICE into the educational process prepares competitive IT specialists to operate within the data-driven product development paradigm and meet Industry 4.0 requirements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CB Insights. (n.d.). The top 12 reasons startups fail. https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/startup-failure-reasons-top/

Pichler, R. (2016). Strategize: Product strategy and product roadmap practices for the digital age. Pichler Consulting. https://agilerequirements.ir/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Strategize-Product-Strategy-and-Product-Roadmap-Practices-for-the-Digital-Age.pdf

Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2020). The Scrum guide: The definitive guide to Scrum: The rules of the game. Scrum.org. https://scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2020/2020-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf

Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Business. https://ia800509.us.archive.org/7/items/TheLeanStartupErickRies/The%20Lean%20Startup%20-%20Erick%20Ries.pdf

Maurya, A. (2022). Running lean: Iterate from Plan A to a plan that works. O’Reilly Media. https://belinitiative.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Ash-Maurya-Running-Lean-Iterate-from-Plan-A-to-a-Plan-That-Works.pdf

ProductPlan. (n.d.). The 2021 state of product management annual report. https://www.productplan.com/state-of-product-management-report/

GrowthMethod. (n.d.). The HiPPO effect: A dangerous animal in growth. https://growthmethod.com/hippo-effect/

Cagan, M. (2017). Inspired: How to create tech products customers love. Wiley.

Olsen, D. (2015). The lean product playbook: How to innovate with minimum viable products and rapid customer feedback. Wiley.

Intercom. (n.d.). RICE: Simple prioritization for product managers. https://www.intercom.com/blog/rice-simple-prioritization-for-product-managers/

Lumi Studio. (n.d.). ICE scoring: How to prioritise competing ideas for startups. https://www.lumi.studio/blog/ice-scoring

PPM Express. (n.d.). From RICE to WSJF: 13 prioritization techniques to improve your project’s workflow. https://www.ppm.express/blog/13-prioritization-techniques

Tasneem, N., Zulzalil, H. B., & Hassan, S. (2025). Enhancing agile software development: A systematic literature review of requirement prioritization and reprioritization techniques. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3539357

Seniv, M. M. (2021). Tool for selecting software development methodology considering project metrics. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 31(3), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.36930/40310318

Buijs, R. (n.d.). RICE vs ICE: Which prioritization framework should you use? https://www.productlift.dev/blog/rice-vs-ice

Atlassian. (n.d.). Backlogs in Scrum. https://www.atlassian.com/agile/scrum/backlogs

Savio. (n.d.). What is the ICE scoring framework? https://www.savio.io/product-roadmap/ice-scoring-model/

Zeda.io. (n.d.). Decoding ICE scoring prioritization model. https://zeda.io/blog/ice-scoring-prioritisation-model

Productboard. (n.d.). 2024 product management trends. https://www.productboard.com/ebook/2024-product-management-trends/

ProductPlan. (n.d.). RICE scoring model. https://www.productplan.com/glossary/rice-scoring-model/

Product School. (n.d.). How to use the RICE framework for better prioritization. https://productschool.com/blog/product-fundamentals/rice-framework

ProductPlan. (n.d.). The 2025 state of product management report. https://www.productplan.com/2025-state-of-product-management-report/

Tsarov, V. M. (2023). Some aspects of modifying task prioritization frameworks in product IT. Scientific Notes, 31(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.33111/vz_kneu.31.22.02.23.159.165

Yatsenko, V. (2025). Comparative analysis of feature prioritization methods: ICE, RICE, WSJF, MoSCoW and their applicability for startups. Nauka Online, (10). https://nauka-online.com/publications/economy/2025/10/06-29/

Kuchakovska, H., & Khorolska, K. (2025). Integration of Lean Canvas into IT specialist training as a mechanism for simplifying complex decision-making. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 2(30), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.30.976

Downloads


Abstract views: 5

Published

2026-03-26

How to Cite

Kuchakovska, H., & Khorolska, K. (2026). RICE AND ICE MODELS AS TOOLS FOR FORMALIZING PRIORITIZATION OF IT PRODUCT FUNCTIONALITY IN TRAINING FUTURE IT SPECIALISTS. Electronic Professional Scientific Journal «Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique», 4(32), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.32.1119

Most read articles by the same author(s)