NEURAL NETWORK ARCHITECTURES FOR PREVENTING AND DETECTING VARIOUS TYPES OF CYBER ATTACKS ON NETWORK RESOURCES DURING MARTIAL LAW

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.34.1253

Keywords:

intrusion detection systems, neural network architecture, hybrid models, machine learning, class imbalance, cyber attack, martial law

Abstract

This paper substantiates a comprehensive approach to developing intelligent intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS) based on deep neural networks to protect critical infrastructure facilities under martial law conditions. It is proven that the physical degradation of telecommunications and communication instability during combat operations generate anomalous background network traffic, which negates the effectiveness of traditional signature-based methods. Particular attention is paid to solving the fundamental problem of extreme data imbalance: massive attacks mask minority but critically dangerous threats (such as U2R privilege escalation and R2L remote access) characteristic of targeted multi-stage operations by Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs).

To select the optimal mathematical models, an experimental verification of unsupervised algorithms (Kohonen Self-Organizing Maps, SOM), base networks (MLP, CNN), and ensemble hybrid architectures (CNN+MLP, Hopfield+Transformer) was conducted. The performance evaluation was carried out on three datasets of different generations and complexity: the classic KDD99, NSL-KDD, and the modern UNSW-NB15 dataset, which served as an extreme stress test. During the simulation, weighted class balancing mechanisms and procedures for adaptive scaling of the computational capacity of neural networks were successfully implemented.

Experimental results confirm that unsupervised and base models tend to ignore minority classes, demonstrating a critically low detection completeness (Recall) for them. In contrast, hybrid solutions provide a high capability for spatiotemporal generalization. The CNN+MLP architecture showed the best balance in detecting all attack classes, while the Hopfield+Transformer model proved its robustness in recognizing obfuscated patterns. The prospects of implementing multimodal ensembles for the reliable detection of evolving cyber threats in a highly noisy network environment are substantiated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Healey, J. (2024). Cyber effects in warfare: Categorizing the where, what, and why. Texas National Security Review. https://doi.org/10.26153/TSW/56029

Digital Front Lines. (2023, May 25). The evolution of cyber operations in armed conflict. https://digitalfrontlines.io/2023/05/25/the-evolution-of-cyber-operations-in-armed-conflict/

Sytnik, V. (2026, February 23). Ukraine: Facing the intensification of Russian cyber attacks. Regard sur l’Est. https://regard-est.com/ukraine-facing-the-intensification-of-russian-cyber-attacks

Popov, O., & Drahuntsov, R. (2025). Key challenges for cybersecurity operations centers in the context of full-scale war [In Ukrainian]. Information Technology and Society, 3(18), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.32689/maup.it.2025.3.19

State Service of Special Communications and Information Protection of Ukraine. (2026). CERT-UA processed almost 6,000 cyber incidents in 2025: The number of hostile attacks increased by 37% [In Ukrainian]. https://cip.gov.ua/ua/news/cert-ua-u-2025-roci-opracyuvala-maizhe-6000-kiberincidentiv-kilkist-vorozhikh-atak-zrosla-na-37

Google Cloud. (2026). Cybersecurity forecast 2026. https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/cybersecurity-forecast-2026-en.pdf

ESET. (2026). ESET Research APT report: Russian cyberattacks in Ukraine intensify, Sandworm unleashes new destructive wiper. https://www.eset.com/us/about/newsroom/research/eset-research-apt-report-russian-cyberattacks-in-ukraine-intensify-sandworm-unleashes-new-destructive-wiper/

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (2022). Update: Destructive malware targeting organizations in Ukraine. https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa22-057a

Neto, E. C. P., Dadkhah, S., Ferreira, R., Zohourian, A., Lu, R., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2023). CICIoT2023: A real-time dataset and benchmark for large-scale attacks in IoT environment. Sensors, 23(13), 5941. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135941

Hleha, K., & Hol, V. (2025). XAI optimization for low-latency neural-based intrusion detection systems in network environments. Bulletin of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series “Mathematical Modeling. Information Technology. Automated Control Systems”, 66, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.26565/2304-6201-2025-66-02

Chao, J., & Xie, T. (2024). Deep learning-based network security threat detection and defense. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15(11).

Mohale, V. Z., & Obagbuwa, I. C. (2025). Evaluating machine learning-based intrusion detection systems with explainable AI: Enhancing transparency and interpretability. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7, 1520741.

Okafor, M. O. (2024). Deep learning in cybersecurity: Enhancing threat detection and response. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 24(3), 1116-1132.

Jyothi, K. K., et al. (2024). A novel optimized neural network model for cyber attack detection using enhanced whale optimization algorithm. Scientific Reports, 14, 5590. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55098-2

Abbas, S., et al. (2024). Evaluating deep learning variants for cyber-attacks detection and multi-class classification in IoT networks. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e1793.

Al Hwaitat, A. K., & Fakhouri, H. N. (2024). Adaptive cybersecurity neural networks: An evolutionary approach for enhanced attack detection and classification. Applied Sciences, 14, 9142. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14199142

Barr, M. (2025). A robust neural network against adversarial attacks. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 15(2), 20609-20615.

Alzaidy, S., & Binsalleeh, H. (2024). Adversarial attacks with defense mechanisms on convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks for malware classification. Applied Sciences, 14, 1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041673

Dalal, S., et al. (2023). Extremely boosted neural network for more accurate multi-stage cyber attack prediction in cloud computing environment. Journal of Cloud Computing, 12, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-022-00356-9

Wang, B., et al. (2024). DDoS-MSCT: A DDoS attack detection method based on multiscale convolution and transformer. IET Information Security, 2024, 1056705.

Saini, S., Chennamaneni, A., & Sawyerr, B. (2024). A review of the duality of adversarial learning in network intrusion: Attacks and countermeasures [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13880

Chhetri, B., & Namin, A. S. (2025). The application of transformer-based models for predicting consequences of cyber attacks. In 2025 IEEE 49th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC). IEEE.

Sharma, A., et al. (2024). Neural network based zero-day-attack detection: A machine learning approach to enhancing cybersecurity. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4848658

Rasikha, V., & Marikkannu, P. (2024). An ensemble deep learning-based cyber attack detection system using optimization strategy. Knowledge-Based Systems, 301, 112211.

Ahmim, A., et al. (2019). A novel hierarchical intrusion detection system based on decision tree and rules-based models. In 2019 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS) (pp. 228-233). IEEE.

Tang, T. A., et al. (2016). Deep learning approach for network intrusion detection in software defined networking. In 2016 International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM) (pp. 258-263). IEEE.

Peng, W., et al. (2019). Network intrusion detection based on deep learning. In 2019 International Conference on Communications, Information System and Computer Engineering (CISCE) (pp. 431-435). IEEE.

Kolosnjaji, B., Zarras, A., Webster, G., & Eckert, C. (2016). Deep learning for classification of malware system call sequences. In Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 137-149). Springer.

Kolosnjaji, B., Eraisha, G., Webster, G., Zarras, A., & Eckert, C. (2017). Empowering convolutional networks for malware classification and analysis. In 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 3838-3845). IEEE.

Zahoruiko, L., et al. (2024). Mathematical model and structure of a neural network for detection of cyber attacks on information and communication systems. Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska, 14(3), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.35784/iapgos.6155

Downloads


Abstract views: 3

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

Zahoruiko, L., Lutsenko, A., Komarov, V., & Yukalchuk, A. (2026). NEURAL NETWORK ARCHITECTURES FOR PREVENTING AND DETECTING VARIOUS TYPES OF CYBER ATTACKS ON NETWORK RESOURCES DURING MARTIAL LAW. Electronic Professional Scientific Journal «Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique», 2(34), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.34.1253