DEVELOPMENT OF A HYBRID CLASSIFIER METHOD FOR DETECTING MALICIOUS REQUESTS BASED ON A COMBINATION OF DETERMINISTIC TOOLS AND GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.35.1445Keywords:
Cybersecurity, GenAI, LLM, Intention Evaluator, LLM-as-a-Judge, GenAI Security, Prompt Injection, Gemma4Abstract
The fast development of GenAI has led to its adoption across various sectors, while also expanding the landscape of cyber threats. This led to rise of critical cybersecurity domain: GenAI Security. Efforts to protect the GenAI currently rely on combination of traditional cybersecurity defense methods and AI-native solutions. However, current experience shows that neither approach is sufficient on its own. While traditional methods are effective against known threats, they fail to cover the semantic threats, which are native to LLM and systems that are based on their usage, including native security mechanisms of LLM. The critical threat to these systems is Prompt Injection, which is currently ranked as the first in the OWASTP GenAI LLM Top 10 2026. It encompasses a variety of techniques, ranging from concealing malicious commands through encoding to role-playing attacks and manipulation. Consequently, identifying the nature of an incoming prompt and the intent behind it has become a vital step in securing GenAI-based systems. This article focuses on developing a method for classifying prompts by integrating traditional defense mechanisms, such as validation and filtering, with generative AI, utilizing the local model Gemma4:e2b-it-qat. The proposed method features a three-layered structure, which consists of deterministic security controls that are applied to input and output stages, with internal semantic analysis layer of two AI-agents acting as an Intention Evaluator and LLM-as-a-Judge. The evaluation held demonstrated a high detection rate for malicious or suspicious requests when the obfuscation wasn’t used for prompt concealment. Further analysis of handling of obfuscated queries revealed the limitations of the developed method and suggested potential improvements. Also, recommendations for its implementation were provided. This method is expected to perform most efficiently in the systems with clearly defined tasks that do net require creative content generation.
Downloads
References
Huang, K., Ponnapalli, J., Tantsura, J., & Shin, K. T. (2024). Navigating the genai security landscape. У Generative AI security (с. 31–58). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54252-7_2
Ouyang, S., Zhang, J. M., Harman, M., & Wang, M. (2024). An empirical study of the non-determinism of chatgpt in code generation. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1145/3697010
Hines, K., Lopez, G., Hall, M., Zarfati, F., Zunger, Y., & Kıcıman, E. (2025). Defending against indirect prompt injection attacks with spotlighting. У Proceedings of the conference on applied machine learning in information security (с. 48–62). CEUR-WS.org. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3920/
Prompt injection: What it is and how to prevent it - coralogix. (б. д.). Coralogix. https://coralogix.com/ai-blog/prompt-injection-attacks-in-llms-what-are-they-and-how-to-prevent-them/
LLMRisks archive. (б. д.). OWASP Gen AI Security Project. https://genai.owasp.org/llm-top-10/
Coqueret, G., Llull, J., Oswald, F., Pérignon, C., Scheuch, C., & Vilhuber, L. (2026). Randomness in large Language Models: What Researchers Need to Know (And Report). SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7191580
Robert Kemp. (2026). Evaluating prompt injection defenses in large language models: A multi-model empirical study of security–usability trade-offs. Journal of Information Technology, Cybersecurity, and Artificial Intelligence, 3(3), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.70715/jitcai.2026.v3.i3.071
Adaptive Evaluation of Out-of-Band Defenses Against Prompt Injection in LLM Agents. (2026, 11 липня). LaunchSafe. https://launchsafe.com/blog/adaptive-evaluation-out-of-band-defenses
The Dual LLM pattern for building AI assistants that can resist prompt injection. (б. д.). Simon Willison’s Weblog. https://simonwillison.net/2023/Apr/25/dual-llm-pattern/
Xu, P. (2026, 31 серпня). Architecting Against Prompt Injection: Why Filtering Fails and Structure Works — Agentic Fabriq. Agentic Fabriq. https://www.agenticfabriq.com/blog/architecting-against-prompt-injection
NeMo Guardrails vs Llama Guard vs Guardrails AI in 2026. (б. д.). Particula Tech | On-Premise & Private AI Development. https://particula.tech/blog/ai-guardrails-compared-nemo-guardrails-ai-llama-guard
Shanmugarasa, Y., Ding, M., Arachchige, C. M., & Rakotoarivelo, T. (2025). SoK: The privacy paradox of large language models: Advancements, privacy risks, and mitigation. У ASIA CCS '25: 20th ACM asia conference on computer and communications security (с. 425–441). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3708821.3733888
Dorca Josa, A., & Bleda-Bejar, M. (2024). Local llms: Safeguarding data privacy in the age of generative ai. a case study at the university of andorra. У 17th annual international conference of education, research and innovation (с. 7879–7888). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2024.1931
Li, J., Han, B., Li, S., Wang, X., & Li, J. (2024). CoLLM: A collaborative LLM inference framework for resource-constrained devices. У 2024 IEEE/CIC international conference on communications in china (ICCC) (с. 185–190). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccc62479.2024.10681712
Zhang, R., Sullivan, D., Jackson, K., Xie, P., & Chen, M. (2025). Defense against prompt injection attacks via mixture of encodings. У Proceedings of the 2025 conference of the nations of the americas chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies (volume 2: Short papers) (с. 244–252). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-short.21
Gemma4:e2b-it-qat. (б. д.). Ollama · Run AI models locally and in the cloud. https://ollama.com/library/gemma4:e2b-it-qat
Bits and binary digits. (б. д.). Computer Science. https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/soco/projects/1999-00/information-theory/entropy_of_english_9.html
Rogue-security/prompt-injections-benchmark · datasets at hugging face. (б. д.). Hugging Face – The AI community building the future. https://huggingface.co/datasets/rogue-security/prompt-injections-benchmark
Marvin, G., Hellen, N., Jjingo, D., & Nakatumba-Nabende, J. (2024). Prompt engineering in large language models. У Data intelligence and cognitive informatics (с. 387–402). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7962-2_30
Dikici, S., & Bilgin, T. T. (2026). Small language models: A systematic review of computational trade‐offs, privacy advantages and deployment in intelligent systems. Expert Systems, 43(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.70331
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Василь Побережник

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.