METHOD FOR SYNTHESIZING AND PRIORITIZING CYBER INCIDENT SCENARIOS IN CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE USING LLM AND AHP

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.35.1461

Keywords:

large language models, cyber incident scenarios, object-event synthesis, analytic hierarchy process, critical infrastructure, electricity distribution, decision support

Abstract

The paper deals with the problem of linking each stage of a multi-stage cyberattack on critical infrastructure to the assets, accounts and operational control systems involved. Existing methods based on attack trees require a predefined system model, while approaches based on large language models (LLMs) do not check the organizational support of each generated attack step. This study aims to develop and experimentally evaluate an LLM-assisted decision-support method for the automated synthesis and multi-criteria prioritization of cyber incident scenarios. The proposed method is based on asymmetric generation: the organization in its initial operational state is decomposed hierarchically into assets, and causal event sequences are generated backward from a given incident. Structures generated by an LLM are validated against a JSON schema and checked for graph consistency, while the analyst identifies missing elements for local refinement. Complete scenarios are prioritized using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). An event sequence is accepted only when every supporting object belongs to the organization’s hierarchy. Experimental evaluation used a modeled case of unauthorized switching that de-energizes substations of a regional electricity distribution operator in Ukraine. Four rounds of refinement recovered all events of the reference model with their causal relationships and object-event connections and produced five complete variants of attack scenarios. Four of these variants depended on a single relationship between the shared control service and the organizational hierarchy. Personnel credential compromise ranks first in the prioritization with a score of 0.816, ahead of the shorter dispatcher session takeover, and retains first place in all runs of the sensitivity analysis. These experimental results show that combining LLMs with formal graph checks detects attack steps that lack supporting organizational objects. In practice, security operations centers (SOCs) can use the approach to find critical dependencies of attacks and to decide which credentials and operational procedures to protect first.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

State Service of Special Communications and Information Protection of Ukraine. (2026, January 7). CERT-UA processed nearly 6,000 cyber incidents in 2025: Hostile attack volume rose by 37%. https://cip.gov.ua/en/news/cert-ua-u-2025-roci-opracyuvala-maizhe-6000-kiberincidentiv-kilkist-vorozhikh-atak-zrosla-na-37

Lee, R. M., Assante, M. J., & Conway, T. (2016, March 18). Analysis of the cyber attack on the Ukrainian power grid: Defense use case. Electricity Information Sharing and Analysis Center. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/3891751/SANS-and-Electricity-Information-Sharing-and.pdf

Maynard, P., McLaughlin, K., & Sezer, S. (2020). Decomposition and sequential-AND analysis of known cyber-attacks on critical infrastructure control systems. Journal of Cybersecurity, 6(1), Article tyaa020. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyaa020

State Service of Special Communications and Information Protection of Ukraine. (2022, April 12). Heavy cyberattack on Ukraine’s energy sector prevented. https://cip.gov.ua/en/news/poperedzhena-masshtabna-kiberataka-na-energetichnii-sektor-ukrayini

Ferdous, R., Khan, F., Sadiq, R., Amyotte, P., & Veitch, B. (2013). Analyzing system safety and risks under uncertainty using a bow-tie diagram: An innovative approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 91(1–2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.08.010

Jhawar, R., Kordy, B., Mauw, S., Radomirović, S., & Trujillo-Rasua, R. (2015). Attack trees with sequential conjunction. In ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection (pp. 339–353). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18467-8_23

International Organization for Standardization. (2024). Automation systems and integration – Object-Process Methodology (ISO Standard No. 19450:2024). https://www.iso.org/standard/84612.html

Bryans, J., Liew, L. S., Nguyen, H. N., Sabaliauskaite, G., Shaikh, S., & Zhou, F. (2020). A template-based method for the generation of attack trees. In Information Security Theory and Practice (pp. 155–165). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41702-4_10

Groner, R., Witte, T., Raschke, A., Hirn, S., Pekaric, I., Frick, M., Tichy, M., & Felderer, M. (2023). Model-based generation of attack-fault trees. In Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (pp. 107–120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40923-3_9

Birchler De Allende, A., Sultan, B., & Apvrille, L. (2025). Automated attack tree generation using artificial intelligence and natural language processing. In Risks and Security of Internet and Systems (pp. 141–156). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89350-6_9

Prapty, R. T., Kundu, A., & Iyengar, A. (2024). Using retriever augmented large language models for attack graph generation (arXiv:2408.05855). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.05855

Ahmed, C. M. (2025). AttackLLM: LLM-based attack pattern generation for an industrial control system. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Foundation Models for Cyber-Physical Systems & Internet of Things (pp. 31–36). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3722565.3727196

Guan, L., Valmeekam, K., Sreedharan, S., & Kambhampati, S. (2023). Leveraging pre-trained large language models to construct and utilize world models for model-based task planning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 79081–79094. https://doi.org/10.52202/075280-3459

Andreiev, D., Chornyi, A., Stopochkina, I., & Ilin, M. (2026). Methodology for automating cyber incident reports using LLM. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 1(33), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.33.1156

Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I

Dolgova, N., Shapovalova, O., & Solodovnyk, H. (2025). Decision support framework for critical infrastructure cybersecurity planning. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 1(29), 348–372. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.29.884

Lande, D., Alekseichuk, L., Svoboda, I., & Strashnoy, L. (2024). Methodology of a swarm of virtual experts for evaluating the weight of connections in networks. Theoretical and Applied Cybersecurity, 6(2), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.20535/tacs.2664-29132024.2.319946

Svoboda, I. (2025). Automating cybersecurity decision-making with AI and the analytic hierarchy process. Theoretical and Applied Cybersecurity, 7(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.20535/tacs.2664-29132025.2.338865

Svoboda, I., & Lande, D. (2026). Prioritization of security controls for critical infrastructure using the analytic network process and large language models. Collection “Information Technology and Security”, 14(1), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.20535/2411-1031.2026.14.1.365500

Stouffer, K., Pease, M., Tang, C., Zimmerman, T., Pillitteri, V., Lightman, S., Hahn, A., Saravia, S., Sherule, A., & Thompson, M. (2023). Guide to Operational Technology (OT) Security (NIST Special Publication 800-82 Revision 3). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-82r3

MITRE ATT&CK. (2026). Enterprise Matrix (ATT&CK version 19.2). https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/matrices/enterprise/

MITRE ATT&CK. (2026). ICS Matrix (ATT&CK version 19.2). https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/matrices/ics/

Government Computer Emergency Response Team of Ukraine. (2024, April 19). Plans of UAC-0133 (Sandworm) for cyber sabotage at almost 20 critical infrastructure facilities of Ukraine. https://cert.gov.ua/article/6278706

Ministry of Energy of Ukraine. (2025). On approval of the Cyber protection requirements for the fuel and energy sector of critical infrastructure (Order No. 403). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/z1599-25

Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry of Ukraine. (2018). On approval of the Rules for performing operational switching in electrical installations (Order No. 77). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/z0211-18

Downloads


Abstract views: 1

Published

2026-10-26

How to Cite

Svoboda, I. (2026). METHOD FOR SYNTHESIZING AND PRIORITIZING CYBER INCIDENT SCENARIOS IN CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE USING LLM AND AHP. Electronic Professional Scientific Journal «Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique», 3(35), 924–935. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.35.1461