METHODOLOGY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL DIGITAL RESOURCES IN THE FORM OF ONLINE GAMES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2023.22.249256

Keywords:

educational online games; modeling; game design; adaptability; programming language.

Abstract

The article discusses the main aspects and methods of developing educational computer games. The authors stated that there are a large number of unsolved problems in the field of development of educational games and many questions arise related to models, methods and technologies of development of educational games, their evaluation and analysis, which require careful research and consideration when creating educational content. There is an increase in the popularity of online games in modern conditions of technological progress. The role and benefits of using online games in educational activities and their impact on increasing the motivation to study among students and improving performance are determined. The article provides key aspects of the methodology of developing educational games. Based on the analysis of successful educational games, a scheme of the concept of learning, game design, interactivity and adaptability of an online educational game has been developed. It is proposed to develop a conceptual model of learning based on the results of the analysis of a complex system and current assumptions. It is noted that at this stage the modeling tasks should be clarified, the procedures defined, and the schedule of the simulation experiment drawn up. The importance of carrying out a formal description of the modeling object, built on the development of algorithms for the behavior of the components of a complex system and their interaction, is noted. It is noted that the right choice of programming language is an important aspect of game development, as each language has its own characteristics and is used in different areas of game development. Some of the most common programming languages used to create games are considered and the possibilities of their application in the development of educational online games are analyzed. The idea of developing an online game, which contains adaptive systems that regulate the difficulty and pace of learning, providing assistance as needed, is put forward. The offered educational online game allows you to personalize training and shape the individual development trajectory of the student. It is noted that such a game creates a situation of success, which motivates participants, facilitates the exchange of experience in team games, etc.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B Marques, M. R., Quispe, A., & Ochoa, F. S. (2014). A systematic mapping study on practical approaches to teaching software engineering. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

Malik, B., & Zafar S. (2012). A systematic mapping study on software engineering education. In World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology.

Souza, M. R. A., Moreira, V. L, R., Figueiredo, E., & Costa, H. (2017). Games for Learning: Bridging Game-related Education Methods to Software Engineering Knowledge Areas. In International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) Software Engineering Education and Training Track (SEET).

Kosa, M., Yilmaz, M., O’Connor, R. V., & Clarke, P. M. (2016). Software Engineering Education and Games: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 22(12), 1558–1574.

Baker, A., Navarro, E. O., & Hoek, A. v. d. (2003). Problems and Programmers: an educational software engineering card game. In 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 614–619. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2003.1201245

Wu, B., & Wang, A. I. (2012). A Guideline for Game Development-based Learning: A Literature Review. International Journal of Computer Games Technology. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/103710

Deterding, S., & Dixon D. (2011). Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI).

Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson M. (2007). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE).

Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G. & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 75–88.

Navarro, E. O., & Van Der Hoek, A. (2009). Comprehensive evaluation of an educational software engineering simulation environment. Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEE&T).

Bеrg Mаrklund, B., Еngström, H., & Hеllkvist, M. (2019). What empirical research tells us about game development. Computer game, 8, 179–198.

Gee, J. P. (2013). The Anti-Education Era: Creating Smarter Students through Digital Learning. NYC.: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gee, J. P. (2003). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.

Heeter, C. (2003). Interactivity in educational games: A qualitative analysis of how students respond to game features. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2(51), 81–-114.

Ishak, S., Hasran, U., & Din, R. (2023). Media Education through Digital Games: A Review on Design and Factors Influencing Learning Performance. Special Issue “Active Teaching and Learning: Educational Trends and Practices”, 2(13).

Skliarenko, O. V., Yahodzinsky, S. M., Nikolaievskyi, O. Y., & Nevzorov, A. V. (2024). Digital interactive learning technologies as an integral part of the modern educational process. Scientific journal “Innovative Pedagogy”, 68(2), 250–257.

Kolodinska, Y. O., Skliarenko, O. V., & Nikolaievskyi, O. Y. (2022). Practical aspects of developing innovative business ideas using digital services. Journal “Economics and Management”, 4, 53–60.

Downloads


Abstract views: 69

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Skliarenko, O., & Pokydko, D. (2023). METHODOLOGY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL DIGITAL RESOURCES IN THE FORM OF ONLINE GAMES. Electronic Professional Scientific Journal «Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique», 2(22), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2023.22.249256