ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT STATE OF SAFETY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES: RELEVANT CHALLENGES AND WAYS TO SOLVE THEM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.28.819

Keywords:

information technology, risk analysis, technogenic safety, multicomponent mixture, phase equilibrium, software, software architecture

Abstract

The constant convergence of dense buildings and high-risk chemical industry facilities causes an increased risk of human exposure to hazardous accident factors. Risk minimization is one of the main tasks of risk management. Without the use of safety information technologies (SIT), it is virtually impossible to quantify the risk of structurally complex chemical and technological facilities that may contain dozens of hazard sources, each of which may be an apparatus with a difficult to predict behavior: a tank, reactor, separator, etc. Studies demonstrate a gradual shift from steady-state leakage models with a chemical pseudo-component to dynamic modeling of releases with multicomponent mixtures and phase equilibrium. However, do the SITs available on the market correspond to the level of development of the science of industrial safety? A thorough analysis of the publicly available information on commercial and free software products in the field of industrial safety demonstrates a range of unresolved methodological and functional problems that significantly distort estimates of hazardous substances releases, which can lead to both overestimation and underestimation of risk indicators. Such problems as the widespread use of stationary models, replacement of mixtures with psuedo-components, low level of automation and lack of documentation that would substantiate the methodological basis of software products were identified. Based on the analysis, the basic requirements for a state-of-the-art SIT were proposed and the architecture of the ITB element was developed, which allows the use of model chains (automated calculation scheme) and takes into account the ability of models to consider multicomponent mixtures with phase equilibrium at each stage of the emergency depressurization process, which potentially significantly increases the accuracy of the results of the accident consequences forecast and reduces the time of the expert to complete the task.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gant, S. E., & Tucker, H. (2018). Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modelling of atmospheric dispersion for land-use planning around major hazards sites in Great Britain. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 54, 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.03.015

IEC 31010:2019. Risk management — Risk assessment techniques. (First edition 01.07.2019). https://www.iso.org/standard/72140.html

Begun, V.V. (2020). Metodolohichni osnovy informacijnoy tehnolohii upravlinya bezpekoju na osnovi rizik-orijentovanoho pidhodu (Methodological basis of information technology of safety management based on risk-oriented approach): dissertation … D-r tech. sciences: 05.13.06 / Institute of Mathematical Machines and Systems Problems of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv. http://www.immsp.kiev.ua/postgraduate/Dysertaciji/dis_Begun_2020.pdf

Witlox, H. W. M., et al. (2006). Modelling the consequence of hazardous multi-component two-phase releases to the atmosphere. American Society of Safety Engineers. Middle East Chapter. 7-th Professional Development Conference & Exhibition, Kingdom of Bahrain, 151. https://www.icheme.org/media/9803/xix-paper-15.pdf

Stene, J., Harper, M., & Henk, W. M. W. (2016). Modelling Transient Leaks of Multi-Component Fluids Including Time-Varying Phase Composition. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 48, 169–174. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1648029

Smalii V., & Tolok E. (2022). Model of multicomponent liquid pool evaporation formed due accidental spills. Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources. 2(26), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.31471/2415-3184-2022-2(26)-122-132

Consequence analysis with Phast. DNV. (n. d.). https://www.dnv.com/software/services/

plant/consequence-analysis-phast

Quantitative risk analysis with Safeti software tools. (n. d.). DNV. https://www.dnv.com/software/services/plant/quantitative-risk-analysis-safeti/

Phast Multi-Component Extension - Atmospheric dispersion modelling software. (n. d.). DNV. https://www.dnv.com/Default

How to use the new methods in Safeti 8.4 for storing the risk results database. (n. d.). DNV. https://www.dnv.com/videos/how-to-upgrade-custom-materials-to-phast-safeti-8-4-195033/

How to create a CFD dispersion source scenario from a classic scenario in Phast 9.0. (n. d.). DNV. https://www.dnv.com/videos/how-to-run-multiple-cfd-scenarios-in-phast-9-0-25082632/

US EPA O. ALOHA Software. (2013). https://www.epa.gov/cameo/aloha-software

Department of Commerce/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (n. d.). The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 67(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/20166482

FLACS Software. (n. d.). https://www.gexcon.com/us/products-services-index/FLACS-Software/4/en

Zappone M. Validation of FLACS CFD code for risk assessment of propane horizontal jet fires: Bachelor thesis. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. (2021). https://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2117/345183

Crowley, C. (n. d.). Review of Source Term Modelling for Hydrocarbon Releases using Process Dynamic Simulation. HAZARDS 25, 1–10.

Labovský, J., Švandová, Z., & Markoš, J. et al. (2007). Model-based HAZOP study of a real MTBE plant. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 20(3), 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.03.015

Jelemenský, Ľ. (2006). Safety analysis and risk identification for a tubular reactor using the HAZOP methodology. Chemical Papers, 60(6), 454–459.

BREEZE Incident Analyst | Trinity Consultants. (n. d.). https://www.trinityconsultants.com/

software/hazard/incident-analyst

Downloads


Abstract views: 0

Published

2025-06-26

How to Cite

Smalii, V., & Begun, V. (2025). ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT STATE OF SAFETY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES: RELEVANT CHALLENGES AND WAYS TO SOLVE THEM. Electronic Professional Scientific Journal «Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique», 4(28), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.28.819