HYBRID ARCHITECTURE OF A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF CYBER RISKS IN CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.33.1128

Keywords:

critical infrastructure, cyber risk, LSTM Autoencoder, anomaly score, risk aggregation, decision support system

Abstract

The article investigates the problem of integrating neural network-based anomaly detection methods with formalized risk assessment mechanisms and decision support models within critical infrastructure environments. The introduction substantiates the relevance of ensuring cyber resilience of critical infrastructure under conditions of increasing attack complexity, expanding attack surfaces, and the limitations of traditional security systems. The problem statement identifies key limitations of existing neural network approaches, including the lack of contextualization, risk-oriented interpretation, and automated recommendation generation mechanisms. The literature review systematizes contemporary approaches to LSTM-, autoencoder-, and transformer-based anomaly detection, as well as methods for dynamic cyber risk assessment. The research objective is formulated as the development of a hybrid architecture that integrates behavioral anomaly detection, aggregation of anomaly scores into an integral risk indicator, and automated response scenario generation. The proposed multi-layer architecture includes a Data Layer, Neural Detection Layer (LSTM Autoencoder), Risk Aggregation Layer (top-k aggregation with asset criticality coefficient), and a Decision Support Layer with a threshold-based recommendation model. The computation of anomaly scores, integral risk, and management action functions is formally defined. Experimental validation was conducted on the BETH dataset using two evaluation modes: Normal-only and Mixed. In the Mixed mode, the model achieved ROC-AUC = 0.874 and PR-AUC = 0.828 at the window level, and Session ROC-AUC = 0.8235 after risk aggregation. The Action Precision metric of 0.9333 confirms the effectiveness of the incident prioritization mechanism. Low latency (~0.35 ms) demonstrates suitability for near real-time application. The conclusions demonstrate that integrating a neural anomaly detector with a risk-oriented decision support model improves interpretability, reduces false escalations, and ensures adaptability to different data regimes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Malhotra, P., Vig, L., Shroff, G., & Agarwal, P. (2016). LSTM-based encoder–decoder for multi-sensor anomaly detection. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00148

Du, M., Li, F., Zheng, G., & Srikumar, V. (2017). DeepLog: Anomaly detection and diagnosis from system logs through deep learning.

Chourasiya, V., Kumar, A., & Singh, P. (2025). Advanced system log analyzer for anomaly detection and cyber forensic investigations using LSTM and transformer networks.

Nasirzadeh, M., Tahmoresnezhad, J., & Rashidi-Khazaee, P. (2025). A unified framework for detecting point and collective anomalies in operating system logs via collaborative transformers. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 45698. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27693-4

Kummerow, M., Müller, T., & Freiling, F. (2024). Explainable transformer-based autoencoders for anomaly detection. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06517

Poolsappasit, N., Dewri, R., & Ray, I. (2012). Dynamic security risk management using Bayesian attack graphs.

Feng, C., Li, T., & Chana, I. (2018). Multi-level anomaly detection in industrial control systems via deep learning. IEEE Access, 6, 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2784915

Malhotra, P., Vig, L., Shroff, G., & Agarwal, P. (2016). Long short-term memory networks for anomaly detection in time series. In Proceedings of the 23rd European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN 2016) (pp. 89-94).

Poolsappasit, N., Dewri, R., & Ray, I. (2012). Dynamic security risk management using Bayesian attack graphs. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 9(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2011.34

Saha, S., Deb, S., & Das, S. (2020). Machine learning-based intrusion detection system for critical infrastructure protection. Future Generation Computer Systems, 108, 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.02.049

Downloads


Abstract views: 2

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Shkolnikov, V., Lysov, B., Khalygov, A., & Huskova, V. (2026). HYBRID ARCHITECTURE OF A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF CYBER RISKS IN CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECTS. Electronic Professional Scientific Journal «Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique», 1(33), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.33.1128