METHOD FOR DECISION SUPPORT AND DEPENDABILITY ASSURANCE OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS OF SITUATIONAL CENTERS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.34.1272

Keywords:

dependability, information systems, situational centers, decision support, intelligent technologies, multicriteria evaluation, risk management, knowledge base, adaptive decision-making, cybersecurity

Abstract

The paper addresses the problem of decision support for ensuring the dependability of information systems of situational centers under conditions of increasing complexity of information and communication infrastructures, a growing number of destabilizing influences, and rising requirements for the continuity of critical service operation. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to improve the validity of decisions made during the management of situational center information systems, as well as the necessity to consider a large number of interrelated operational parameters, risks, and potential consequences of threat realization. The aim of the study is to develop a method for decision support and dependability assurance of situational center information systems based on comprehensive system state analysis, risk assessment, and multicriteria selection of alternatives. The decision-support process for ensuring the dependability of situational center information systems is formalized, and a mathematical model is developed that takes into account the current system state, risk level, available resources, and possible consequences of destabilizing influences. A method is proposed that enables the generation of a set of feasible alternatives, their multicriteria evaluation, and the selection of the most appropriate decision considering its impact on dependability indicators. An architecture of an intelligent decision support system is developed, providing knowledge accumulation, adaptation to changing operating conditions, and improvement of decision quality. Unlike existing approaches, the proposed method integrates information system state assessment, risk analysis, alternative generation, and decision support within a unified dependability assurance process. Simulation results confirmed improved decision validity, reduced time required for alternative selection, and enhanced dependability indicators of the information system. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of applying the proposed method in situational center information systems to improve management efficiency, operational resilience, and continuity of information service provision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajayi, O. O., Kurien, A., Djouani, K., & Dieng, L. (2025). Artificial intelligence for infrastructure resilience: Transportation systems as a strategic case for policy and practice. Sustainability, 17(20), Article 8992. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17208992

Leyli-Abadi, M., Bessa, R. J., Viebahn, J., Boos, D., Borst, C., Castagna, A., & Yagoubi, M. (2025). A conceptual framework for AI-based decision systems in critical infrastructures. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (pp. 5799-5806). IEEE.

Järveläinen, J., Dang, D., Mekkanen, M., & Vartiainen, T. (2025). Towards a framework for improving cybersecurity resilience of critical infrastructure against cyber threats: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Decision Systems, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2025.2479546

Jovanović, A. S. (2025). Stress-testing the resilience of critical infrastructures exposed to polycrises triggered by emerging risks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 16, 594-617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-025-00663-0

Pasic, A. (2025). Crisis management and resilience of critical infrastructure: SUNRISE project insights. Crisis Management Days. https://ojs.vvg.hr/index.php/DKU/article/view/673

Bîlbîie, I., & Ciolponea, C.-A. (2025). Considerations on cyber situational awareness: Theoretical fundamentals and implementation models. Land Forces Academy Review, 30, 445-453. https://doi.org/10.2478/raft-2025-0043

Kramer, D., Rosique, L., Narotam, A., Bursztein, E., Kelley, P. G., Thomas, K., & Woodruff, A. (2025). Integrating large language models into security incident response. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS ’25) (Article 8, pp. 133-148). USENIX Association.

Hammar, K., Alpcan, T., & Lupu, E. C. (2025). Incident response planning using a lightweight large language model with reduced hallucination (arXiv:2508.05188). arXiv.

Ren, S., Jin, J., Niu, G., & Liu, Y. (2025). ARCS: Adaptive reinforcement learning framework for automated cybersecurity incident response strategy optimization. Applied Sciences, 15(2), Article 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15020951

Kostiuk, Y., Skladannyi, P., & Rzaieva, S. (2026). Quality management of SIEM alerts based on risk-oriented assessment and SOC feedback. Ukrainian Information Security Research Journal, 31(3), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.18372/2225-5036.31.21161

Muñoz-Navarro, E., Hernández-Montesinos, J. J., Marqués-Moreno, A., Papadopoulos, L., Karteris, A., & Demestichas, K. (2025). PRAETORIAN: From protection to resilience of critical infrastructures. In I. Gkotsis, D. Kavallieros, N. Stoianov, S. Vrochidis, D. Diagourtas, & B. Akhgar (Eds.), Paradigms on technology development for security practitioners (Security Informatics and Law Enforcement). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62083-6_13

Kostiuk, Y., Rzaieva, S., & Rzaiev, D. (2026). Intelligent analysis of network traffic for detecting information security incidents. Science and Technology Today, 2(56), 1909–1928. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6025-2026-2(56)-1909-1928

Dacorogna, M., Debbabi, N., & Kratz, M. (2023). Building up cyber resilience by better grasping cyber risk via a new algorithm for modelling heavy-tailed data. European Journal of Operational Research, 311(2), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.05.003

Kostiuk, Y., Skladannyi, P., Rzaieva, S., Samoilenko, Y., & Korshun, N. (2025). Intelligent control and protection systems in cyber-physical and cloud Smart Grid environments. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 2(30), 125–156. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.30.956

Yazo-Cabuya, E. J., Ibeas, A., & Rey-Caballero, R. (2025). Multi-criteria decision making for risk management in quality management systems. Sustainability, 17(3), Article 1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031092

Dovzhenko, N., Ivanichenko, Y., & Kostiuk, Y. (2025). A methodology for detecting and localizing cyber threats in cloud environments with integrated IoT components based on graph models. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 1(29), 762-776. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.29.938

Klein, T., & Romano, G. (2025). Optimizing cybersecurity incident response via adaptive reinforcement learning. Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.62177/jaet.v2i1.212

Skladannyi, P., Kostiuk, Y., Rzaieva, S., Samoilenko, Y., & Savchenko, T. (2025). Development of modular neural networks for detecting different classes of network attacks. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 3(27), 534-548. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.27.772

Lin, X., Zhang, J., Deng, G., Liu, T., Zhang, T., Guo, Q., & Chen, R. (2025). IRCopilot: Automated incident response with large language models (arXiv:2505.20945). arXiv.

Rzaieva, S. L., Lytvyn, O. S., Skladannyi, P. M., Kostiuk, Y. V., & Rzaiev, D. O. (2026). A model of adaptive cybersecurity management for information and communication systems based on a risk-oriented approach. Mathematical Machines and Systems, 2, 92-109. https://doi.org/10.34121/1028-9763-2026-2-92-109

Alavizadeh, H., Jang-Jaccard, J., Enoch, S. Y., Al-Sahaf, H., Welch, I., Camtepe, S. A., & Kim, D. S. (2022). A survey on threat situation awareness systems: Framework, techniques, and insights. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(5), Article 107. https://doi.org/10.1145/3530809

Kostiuk, Y., Skladannyi, P., Sokolov, V., & Rzaieva, S. (2025). Intelligent system for simulation modeling and research of information objects. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Software Engineering and Semantic Technologies (SEST 2025), co-located with the 15th International Scientific and Practical Programming Conference (UkrPROG 2025) (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 4053, pp. 237-251). CEUR-WS.org.

Aghazadeh Ardebili, A., Lezzi, M., & Pourmadadkar, M. (2024). Risk assessment for cyber resilience of critical infrastructures: Methods, governance, and standards. Applied Sciences, 14(24), Article 11807. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411807

Kostiuk, Y. (2025). Multi-agent system for detecting and counteracting attacks on the enterprise information system. In Insider threats and security in corporations (pp. 205-232). https://doi.org/10.36690/ITSC-205-232

Maček, D., Magdalenić, I., & Begičević Ređep, N. (2021). A model for the evaluation of critical IT systems using multicriteria decision-making with elements for risk assessment. Mathematics, 9(9), Article 1045.

Kostiuk, Y., Skladannyi, P., Sokolov, V., & Vorokhob, M. (2025). Models and technologies of cognitive agents for decision-making with integration of artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the Modern Data Science Technologies Doctoral Consortium (MoDaST 2025) (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 4005, pp. 82-96). CEUR-WS.org.

Kure, H. I., Islam, S., & Mouratidis, H. (2022). An integrated cybersecurity risk management framework and risk prediction for critical infrastructure protection. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(18), 15241-15271.

Kostiuk, Y., Skladannyi, P., Sokolov, V., Hulak, H., & Korshun, N. (2024). Models and algorithms for analyzing information risks during the security audit of personal data information systems. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Cyber Hygiene & Conflict Management in Global Information Networks (CH&CMiGIN’24) (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3925, pp. 155-171). CEUR-WS.org.

Sarker, I. H. (2024). Introduction to AI-driven cybersecurity and threat intelligence. In AI-driven cybersecurity and threat intelligence: Cyber automation, intelligent decision-making and explainability (pp. 3-19). Springer Nature Switzerland.

Pliekhov, O. (2026). AI-driven message prioritization for offline BLE mesh networks in disaster response scenarios [Preprint]. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6428398

Downloads


Abstract views: 10

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

Hrechaninov, V. (2026). METHOD FOR DECISION SUPPORT AND DEPENDABILITY ASSURANCE OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS OF SITUATIONAL CENTERS. Electronic Professional Scientific Journal «Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique», 2(34), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.34.1272